[ValkoVer]

No, i see a lot servers in 4.2 too, but they are all empty... When i launched 4.1 (just after quitting 4.2 with no players, so it wasn't because time of day Frankie) there were plenty of servers with players. So, why everyone still play 4.1 instead of 4.2?

[FS Frankie V]

ValkoVer, on 02 November 2012 - 11:27 PM, said:

No, i see a lot servers in 4.2 too, but they are all empty... When i launched 4.1 (just after quitting 4.2 with no players, so it wasn't because time of day Frankie) there were plenty of servers with players. So, why everyone still play 4.1 instead of 4.2?

Historically speaking player and server migration has always taken time, a few months from what I understand, and a larger percentage of players and servers on 4.1 don't even know that there is an update available. Based on the maths the current migration is right on the numbers.

[SilverFoxZ]

Frankie V, on 02 November 2012 - 11:53 PM, said:

Historically speaking player and server migration has always taken time, a few months from what I understand, and a larger percentage of players and servers on 4.1 don't even know that there is an update available. Based on the maths the current migration is right on the numbers.

Most will probaly switch when the new leagues are going to be played on 4.2.

[[PCC]Camacho]

Doe.TwainColts, on 28 October 2012 - 11:52 AM, said:

After 6 maps server crashed, but it's not a real crash with server going offline,
seems more like an exception mananaged with a self dirty restart:

mapcycle:

ut4_abbey
{
g_nextmap ut4_algiers
}

ut4_algiers
{
g_nextmap ut4_sanc
}

ut4_sanc
{
g_nextmap ut4_riyadh
}

If server restarts (no "crash") itself in algiers, it continues with
- abbey (first in mapcycle)
- sanc (g_nextmap stile alive!!!)

Not a real crash (to me).

http://www.urbanterr....106.100:27960/


edit: 4.2.002 was ok.

Are you sure it's not a server crash, I think most of us have scripts set to autorestart instantly whenever the server dies. Mine tends to crash and come back up in seconds.