[Mr.Goldfish (old)]

If you are having a hard time deciding on which assault rifle to pick just come back here to look up all the stats of the them. If you read this thread, can you please bump this thread so other people can have a chance to pick a weapon, thank you.

== Outline of Assault Rifle Stats ==
I. G36
A. Damage
1. Head - 100%
2. Torso - 44%
3. Arms - 17%
4. Legs - 17%
B. Attachments
1. Silencer
C. Scope?
1. Yes

II. AK103
A. Damage
1. Head 100%
2. Torso - 51%
3. Arms - 19%
4. Legs - 19%
B. Attachments
1. Silencer
2. Laser Sight
C. Scope?
1. No

III. LR300
A. Damage
1. Head - 100%
2. Torso - 44%
3. Arms - 17%
4. Legs - 17%
B. Attachments
1. Silencer
2. Laser Sight
C. Scope?
1. No

III. M4A1
A. Damage
1. Head - 100%
2. Torso - 44 %
3. Arms - 17%
4. Legs - 17%
B. Attachments
1. Silencer
2. Laser Sight
C. Scope?
1. No

IV. Accuracy from Most to Least at Start of Clip
A. G36
B. AK103
C. LR300 and M4

V. Accuracy from Most to least at End of Clip
A. G36
B. Lr300 and M4
C. AK103

VI. Maximum Rate of Fire from Fastest to Slowest
A. LR300 and M4 - 493 rounds per minute
B. G36 - 435 rounds per minute
C. AK103 - 423 rounds per minute

VII. Ranges
A. G36 - Best at long range, not as good close up.
1. Best assault rifle for long range because of scope. Not good at up close because slow fire and does as much damage as M4 and LR300.
B. Lr300 and M4 - Good from medium range to close range.
1. Good for medium range because it is more than AK103 when at end of clip.
C. AK103 - Best assault rifle for close combat.
1. Best for close combat because less ammo is wasted and high damage. While other is reloading you still have bullets to kill with.

VIII. Contributors
A. RogerWilco
B. dOnDoN

My Comments:
* I have updated my information so that it is more accurate.

[heretic (old)]

AK more accurate than LR of M4..?

No way.  I'd even say the G36 isnt.  All the gun's first shots hit where the dot is.  And recoil on the LR and M4 are less than the G36 and AK

[Flinn (old)]

accuracy most to least.
Lr300
M4
these 2 are the same

g36
then ak
ak and g36 are not more accurate than lr and m4 do your research again plz.

[Pharax (old)]

Urt source code can be downloaded if I remember correctly. I wonder if people who knew their way around coding could look in it. That way we would be fixed once and for all on that accuracy debate.

ps. I dont know how easy / hard it would be though, dont flame me. I'm just throwing the idea.

[RogerWilco (old)]

Quote

II. AK103
A. Damage
1. Head 100%
2. Torso - 44%

AK does 51% on Torso.

[CheezeyWeezey (old)]

Quote

AK does 51% on Torso.

Roger is right. You got the AK damage wrong. I'm glad that you wrote this up though; it'll certainly be helpful once it's 100% correct

[|it|Seven of Nine]

when will this ever be helpful?

[GlaD-don]

How did you get those RoF figures?

Here's what I have from some testing I did a while back:
M4/LR:
3.65 seconds to empty clip
(60/3.65)*30 = 493 = 500 accounting for error

Negev/MP5:
3.00 seconds for 30 bullets
600 rpm

AK:
4.25 s
423 rpm

G36:
4.13 s
435 rpm

UMP:
4.5 s
400 rpm


Recorded these at timescale 0.5 and then edited the clips in Vegas to get only the guns firing. Each clip was done exactly the same way. The time is half of the clip's length because they were recorded at half speed.

[wraith4.x (old)]

interesting

[ne0]

Quote

interesting

hmm
*sips tea*
i agree
*sips again*
very interesting