Regarding your Display name
#21
Posted 07 March 2010 - 06:15 AM
At the moment there is a limitation in clan tag wearers. If you are the Group OWNER ( the one who owns the group and registered it ) you are not automaticaly in the members page.
May i suggest adding yourself as a Head Admin. Once you are listed on your clans members page you will then be able to use the tag.
This im sure will catch many out. Many appologies
#22
Posted 07 March 2010 - 06:19 AM
#24
Posted 07 March 2010 - 08:30 AM
one thing that scared me was to see the e-mail address in my passport site but it's only viewable to the profile owner.
Quote
#25
Posted 07 March 2010 - 01:49 PM
Maverick, on 06 March 2010 - 07:50 PM, said:
I' wondering this, too. I can now have fancy stuff going on with my "Display Name", but not with my nick names, they're still e.g. converting to lowercase, do not allow punctuations, etc.
#26
Posted 07 March 2010 - 03:29 PM
Now the avatars being greyscale still seems ugly to me; if it's for aesthetic reasons purely, it has an excuse though i don't know if it's completely innocent because of that; in the case it's purely for differentiation - and not aesthetics - i'd call it pure evil.
The short width of the site is a remaining irritation; it can be overwritten though i don't believe it's necessary to stay that way. It could at least be optimized to something like that overwriting script posted's width.
All in all i believe this new look in general (dark, greyscale forcing of avatars) is making people feel a bit more awkward about it than they could have been.
Also, the blue posts for dev members can be turned off for 'unimportant' posts; this is what reddit administrators do; if it's an 'important announcement' they turn on their 'colored' post, if it's pure chatting, they post normally. This makes them blend in better and not feel like they're imposing an 'importance' status. This gives them less chances of being seen as pretentious and raises the importance of the posts that were explicitly colored.
This post has been edited by mitsubishi: 07 March 2010 - 03:41 PM
- Optimized exe; builds of ioq3 engine for urt With GoogleTranslate, Bumpy, dmaHD, iKALiZER, Raw Mouse, Bug Fixes, ..
- Networking, lag meter, and gaming consistency guide
#27
Posted 07 March 2010 - 05:17 PM
rfx, on 07 March 2010 - 01:49 PM, said:
Yes, it does this, but it works like this:
Let's say I register the nickname "H0i"
The system will assign me the nickname "hoi"
This also includes h0i, H0i, H0I, hOI, hOi, h01 and so on.
#28
Posted 07 March 2010 - 09:09 PM
However, I could enter "MaxC." into my nicknames, put it's converted to "maxc" and I don't understand why.
And what's also not clear to me, is now my Forum/Passport name in anyway bound to later passport in-game playing?
#29
Posted 07 March 2010 - 09:18 PM
rfx, on 07 March 2010 - 09:09 PM, said:
However, I could enter "MaxC." into my nicknames, put it's converted to "maxc" and I don't understand why.
And what's also not clear to me, is now my Forum/Passport name in anyway bound to later passport in-game playing?
Your login name here is not related to your ingame name.
If you enter "MaxC" it is changed into "maxc", BUT you will be able to use MaxC if you want to. The nickname says "maxc" but this also inclues "MaxC".
#30
Posted 07 March 2010 - 09:22 PM
H0i, on 07 March 2010 - 09:18 PM, said:
Ah, thanks, didn't knew that! That means I can play on a passport enabled server using passport with any name I like?
Quote
Ok, then .. sorry for my ignorance, what's the nickname thing for then anyway? Just no one else can claim a Forum name with it?
thanks!