[|it|Nexu]

Zack91094, on 26 April 2010 - 09:16 PM, said:

you have to prove that they were cheating.

Yeah and as if that was so easily done and not demand any man power and hours to watch everyones demo (who has been accused) and analyze them into great detail to prove they were cheating...

Zack91094, on 26 April 2010 - 09:16 PM, said:

You could easily record it... pressing f12.

No shit Sherlock. Recording is easy, analyzing it takes way more time.

[[T]BludShoT]

Well it's impossible to prove your opponent was cheating by merely looking at your own demo. Only the extreme dumbest and noobest of hackers could be caught this way.

[Zack91094]

BludShoT, on 26 April 2010 - 09:47 PM, said:

Well it's impossible to prove your opponent was cheating by merely looking at your own demo. Only the extreme dumbest and noobest of hackers could be caught this way.

Actually, I talked with customer support, he just said prove it.. That's all you need, it's not every hard to tell if someones hacking, especially in a demo....

[Zack91094]

Or with a 2 vs 2 match you could EASILY tell on a demo if someone is hacking.Honestly really, it's not hard to tell, your acting like it would take a long time to tell if a person was hacking. Unless your blind..... it's easy.

[NulL]

wow

[Skadude]

You clearly have NO idea.

If someone is wall hacking and very subtle about it. firstly you'd have to get your opponents demo NOT your own. then you have to prove it.. to who? who decides that person is definitely hacking. Sounds like a scam. too easy to bend rules, fix matches and hack.

[Zack91094]

Skadude, on 26 April 2010 - 10:19 PM, said:

You clearly have NO idea.

If someone is wall hacking and very subtle about it. firstly you'd have to get your opponents demo NOT your own. then you have to prove it.. to who? who decides that person is definitely hacking. Sounds like a scam. too easy to bend rules, fix matches and hack.

What if you had a person spectating the person hacking in a demo......

[Rayne]

What I'm wondering is this. If they're using UrT to earn money from it shouldn't they be paying FS?

Quote

14 Frozen Sand License to You
Frozen Sand grants you a personal, non-exclusive, non-transferable limited license to use Urban Terror Passport and Frozen Sand services distributed by Frozen Sand. You may not sub-license, or charge others to use or access Frozen Sand services without first obtaining written permission from Frozen Sand.

I know this forbids charging people to play UrT but what about gambling. They're not charging the use of UrT, but they are earning money from an online electronic entertainment service that should be free.

[Zack91094]

If it was free, the owner wouldn't have a business out of it.

[Rayne]

Zack91094, on 26 April 2010 - 10:28 PM, said:

If it was free, the owner wouldn't have a business out of it.

You're not the smartest dude in the world are ya.