I have always played on a Mac. I am now on my third ban for various accusations. This leads me to believe that those people who claim to be able to spot a hack are in fact not very good at it at all. Getting accused of wallhacks is pretty simple. Turn up the volume, wear Tac Goggles, and read all the death messages. It amazes me that a player can walk in front of a window, fire out of a window, or run around in a room, and then be amazed that I throw a nade in there. If I hear something and I do not see on the minimap that is one of my teamates, I toss a nade.
As a second question, does PB report the operating system of the player. If not, why not?
Advertisement
Are there any Mac Wallhacks/Aimbots not catchable by PB
#3
Posted 22 January 2005 - 10:56 PM
Iam not aware of any hacks but thats not to say it cant be done.
interesting question about the OS - im sure it has to do w/ evenbalances
point of veiw on cheaters systems (most of it is on the PC side). Im not a PB guru, so i dont even know if OS id is available as an option.
Is it the same server/admin that bans you??
interesting question about the OS - im sure it has to do w/ evenbalances
point of veiw on cheaters systems (most of it is on the PC side). Im not a PB guru, so i dont even know if OS id is available as an option.
Is it the same server/admin that bans you??
Advertisement
#6
Posted 23 January 2005 - 06:45 AM
nothing can rule out the possibility to hack any version.
running linux or running macos is not a proof. just an *indication* that there *may* be not a hack.
I run q3 on linux so I don't think I'm biased on that.
since you *know* you haven't cheated better prove it in demos.
or make THEM prove it in demos. that's what formal law does, you have to prove someone is guilty not just believe it's so.
of course, since running macos is an indication, "formal law" would accept it as more evidence :)
running linux or running macos is not a proof. just an *indication* that there *may* be not a hack.
I run q3 on linux so I don't think I'm biased on that.
since you *know* you haven't cheated better prove it in demos.
or make THEM prove it in demos. that's what formal law does, you have to prove someone is guilty not just believe it's so.
of course, since running macos is an indication, "formal law" would accept it as more evidence :)
#7
Posted 23 January 2005 - 07:22 AM
If you're the same Phoenix as I think you are, then don't sweat it man.
Stick to where you're known. We know you have some skill (Those of us that know you.)
There's always going to be llama players as well as llama admins around... in any game (some more so than others).
Out of curiousity, which servers/admins banned you?
Stick to where you're known. We know you have some skill (Those of us that know you.)
There's always going to be llama players as well as llama admins around... in any game (some more so than others).
Out of curiousity, which servers/admins banned you?
1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
Advertisement