[Aarsbuds0r (old)]

That constructive part was meant to the other person, not you bladey =]

[Blade (old)]

Well maybe he should've tried reading the rest of the posts then? ...

[mrp (old)]

i dont think the sr8 is fine .. for one reason ..

too many nerfs too quickly ..

1 ) added great movement penalty
2 ) removed boots so now once u shoot sr8 .. u really are fudged
3 ) (and this is the one which shouldnt of also been done imo .. the other 2 are debateable ) lowered damage of waist/groin shots

i agree with 1 + 2 .. but 3 is a step too far imo.

saying that it doesnt effect my game greatly .. seen as tho i use lr300 mainly anyhow.

[Aarsbuds0r (old)]

mrp, I totally agree with you. Too many nerfs too quickly.

Btw, you forgot that you also cant reload you sr8 directly after a shot anymore if the clip is not empty yet.

[Oswald (old)]

Correct, not intended for you Blade...

[Goofus Maximus (old)]

They must have thought that taking your flashlight was a bright idea.

If you try and get it's whereabouts from them though, they'll likely leave you in the dark.

Whoohoo! This useless reply is just BEAMING with flashlight puns!

On a more on-topic note: I think the SR-8 is just fine now. It's only real problem is the ridiculous lack of accuraccy underwater; and the rest are just quibbles. I use the PSG (badly, but getting better), so I'm used to trying to aim at everyone's heads, so the decreased kill area of the SR-8 doesn't bother me that much.

I'm more interested in why I get more headshots with a spam weapon, when I aim at their feet, than when I aim at their chest/head, while aiming higher gets me more leg, arm and hand shots, yet aiming OVER their heads gets me a lot of headshots as well. People must get annoyed at me, when I get a PSG headshot by shooting the little crescent of the tip-top of their helmet, poking up from the top of the box they're hiding behind...