Lochverstaerker, on 19 August 2013 - 03:40 PM, said:
So...FS is supposed to secure every players computer so that no hacker can steal YOUR auth from YOUR computer? Really?
no but, if auths are stocked on website, ans servers can verify auths so there is a like between server and datas, for a hacker who was able to find a hidden server, i can imagine it's not so complicate to follow the link.
Lochverstaerker, on 19 August 2013 - 03:40 PM, said:
Read the thread, data was collected over several releases.
I did not say all the list was made this 2 last days. BUT I'm sure (I bet my right arm) she has never cheat, so this is the only explaination...
Lochverstaerker, on 19 August 2013 - 03:40 PM, said:
If you really want to use the "errare humanum est" argument, did you ever think about you judging your "friends" wrongly, and that they in fact DID cheat? You can make mistakes, too.
More than you think. and FeeFee more than anyone else. For personal reason that I will not write here.
Lochverstaerker, on 19 August 2013 - 03:40 PM, said:
Do you have any idea how much work that would be?
Also it's totally retarded to do something like this when you can prove that cheats were used otherwise.
Yes I have a good idea.
But if I had just 1 suspicion abour her and eric29 maybe I'll not imply this.
(the same sentence in French : "Si j'avais eu ne serait-ce qu'un doute, je n'aurai probablement pas proposé ça")
More, if this list was indeed made during several weeks, use this process (for example) 1/week, the list would be shorter and the amount of work smaller.
Speak about the amount of work is an argument for Feneant.
When FS started UrT, I don't think they was afraid by the amount of work.
Start something is not something as simple you can do without think. And when it's started, make it going, make it growing is also a big work.
So don't speak about the amount of work.
Lochverstaerker, on 19 August 2013 - 03:40 PM, said:
You destroy your own argument here. Previously saying that "errare humanum est"/humans make mistakes, you now state that humans are more reliable than a code. Cool.
And also saying that "someone was never suspected" is in no way proof that this person never cheated.
In fact according to this collected data, it is likely that this person never cheated on these "well ranked server", but only "tested" a cheat for some minutes on some other server. But this is STILL cheating, and should STILL be punished by a ban.
A code is making by human being, and to make it easier to encode, it should be make by a team. This team can be the strongest team in the world in making AC detector, in making program, they can't think about everything (that's why program can be upgraded/updates and are upgraded/updated).
So yes, for me hundreds of people are more reliable than a code, even if this code is made by a super extra team. So no I don't destroy my own argument. But you try to use it against mine. well try but fail.
I agree, saying that "someone was never suspected" is in no way proof that this person never cheated but it can be a reason to reconsider.
I have asked to
reconsider, not to trust me, or her, or anyone I know.
She has never cheat online AND offline.
Speak about well raked server, it was only to try to give a number of player who see her play and could suspect her but not.
I didn't say that because she's a player on well ranked server, we should reconsider. That's not a reason.
Don't make say something I didn't say. I don't speak english as well as french but I'm not so newbie
~SG~Juno 
Advertisement
This topic is locked
verified user
MultiQuote
