FYI you can use the console to set sensitivity to any number, even decimals. For example drop your console and put sensitivity .45
Just sayin
Advertisement
Ideas for 4.1, post em' here!
#482
Posted 03 December 2007 - 11:29 AM
Quote
Also make it possible to be able to change respawn protection for different gametypes, meaning if there was a vote to go to ffa, get rid of spawn protection as it is impossible to respawn in ffa and people keep respawning in your face with invincibility, spawn protection in ffa is stupid but in other game modes it is good, so there should be a way to set spawn protection values for different gametypes
Good point. A solution: Respawn protection doing both not letting you get hit for say 2 secs but also not able to shoot (or hit) for that time.
(because no protection at all is obviously affecting badly the ones just spawned)
Advertisement
#486
Posted 03 December 2007 - 09:20 PM
Do what? I described a possible solution to a problem (of recently spawned hitting others that happen to be near them) by BOTH having respawn protection and disallowing the recently spawned to fire or hit anything for the same (or similar time). I assumed nexu said it's already possible. Is it?
#487
Posted 03 December 2007 - 09:44 PM
Well, particularly for the problem Ben described that was quoted by nexu, the mapcycle trick wouldn't work. So never mind I guess.
Still, you could do it in a multi mode game server using cvar changes at map load which was what came to mind as I read.
So plbtbtbtbtbtbtbtb
Still, you could do it in a multi mode game server using cvar changes at map load which was what came to mind as I read.
So plbtbtbtbtbtbtbtb
#489
Posted 08 December 2007 - 01:15 PM
Quote
Dunno if this has been suggested already, but how bout a scope attachment for all rifles? Obviously it would use up one of your slots, and it wouldn't make that much of a difference. HKG36 + Silencer or LR-300 + Scope
The lr would be more deadly, however, it wouldn't be as much as some may think at first thought. Its inaccuracy on auto firing is high so it'd need slow tapping to do long range.
It'd make it better so it may be a reason to not do it - at least without changing others - but not so much of a problem.
#490
Posted 08 December 2007 - 01:45 PM
Quote
The lr would be more deadly, however, it wouldn't be as much as some may think at first thought. Its inaccuracy on auto firing is high so it'd need slow tapping to do long range.
It'd make it better so it may be a reason to not do it - at least without changing others - but not so much of a problem.
It'd make it better so it may be a reason to not do it - at least without changing others - but not so much of a problem.
I was thinking the scope would be more for aesthetics / realism value than gameplay balance, but you do bring up a point. However, if we're talking about an "unfair advantage", I'll point out all the people who use SR-8's in close-quarter maps. Also, how about if you use the scope attachment, you can't use the laser. I imagine scope + laser would be practically pinpoint accuracy. Although you could use a scope and a laser in real life.. Hmm. Spose I have to start thinking more along the lines of gameplay vs realism
1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
Advertisement