Advertisement
Get Legit Bro!
#442
Posted 22 August 2013 - 11:33 AM
Juno, on 22 August 2013 - 11:24 AM, said:
Tungs post has disappered?
Yes, because he made an request for it.
Quote
BenQ-XL2420T|Filco-Ninja-TKL-MXRed|Logitech-G403|AKG-K70201000010 01101100 01110101 01110100 01010010 01100001 01110101 00100100 01100011 01101000~The quieter you become, the more you are able to hear.~
Advertisement
#446
Posted 22 August 2013 - 04:08 PM
ROFL, this is comedy gold:
http://www.urbanterr...472#entry347472
You guys are going to need to assign someone the official "go outside and play a game of hide and go fsck yourself" duties to respond to such hilarity.
http://www.urbanterr...472#entry347472
You guys are going to need to assign someone the official "go outside and play a game of hide and go fsck yourself" duties to respond to such hilarity.
#447
Posted 22 August 2013 - 04:13 PM
great job Frozen Sand!
I'm curious now, could you give a number (or a decent estimate) of the actual amount of accounts that logged in during the time you were collecting the data?
I'm curious now, could you give a number (or a decent estimate) of the actual amount of accounts that logged in during the time you were collecting the data?
-WAR-Runamok`
cyrus: "Camping" is a non-issue for a player that uses his/her head.
cyrus: "Camping" is a non-issue for a player that uses his/her head.
#448
Posted 22 August 2013 - 04:18 PM
Brainie, on 21 August 2013 - 10:23 PM, said:
Here I am with another question!
So we have this guy here who's first account was banned for cheating. He comes back with a new account, but with an obvious nickname that referees to his previous account.
What is FS going to do? You banned someone but this ass hole (sorry for the term, let's face the truth) doesn't understand the lesson and goes ahead (if at least he could be discreet, that would be great).
The system is not effective if the banned is not able to come back with discretion.
I'm just upset and pissed off despite my intervention is worth nothing.
So we have this guy here who's first account was banned for cheating. He comes back with a new account, but with an obvious nickname that referees to his previous account.
What is FS going to do? You banned someone but this ass hole (sorry for the term, let's face the truth) doesn't understand the lesson and goes ahead (if at least he could be discreet, that would be great).
The system is not effective if the banned is not able to come back with discretion.
I'm just upset and pissed off despite my intervention is worth nothing.
So Sci-Fi time :D .
It is possible to make it in a way that anticheat does not ban cheaters & there is no banlist , BUT it does better thing it makes the playing experience really unpleasant for them . You know what '' slap '' do to players , do you not ?
Other nastier commands can be added ...
Not recording the player just interact with the hack . So they are welcome for more voluntary torture ;).
& it could also work as '' cheattwister '' in such a way that interacts with the hack & turns it against , so you have a cheater transformed into a absolutely helpless victim .
I do realise that especially the interact part is a little bit to hard to be executed & especially automatically .
& I suggest maybe it is not the most feasable thing to do & maybe not the best one possible either , just sounds nice .
But anyway it is good to dream :D .
And BTW my programming knowledge is very limited , so it is mostly me bullshiting around .
SilverFoxZ, on 21 August 2013 - 11:49 PM, said:
So you could be all compton and stuffs. An outlaw loose and running feeling the adrenaline every second untill you get squashed by that banhammer. Glorious.
'' It's called the panic zone
...
Some people call it torture
but its what we call home ''
:D
#449
Posted 22 August 2013 - 04:25 PM
I seem to remember someone had made a modified server build for 4.1 that caused any hits from a "marked" person to actually damage themselves. While this is amusing, it does allow a cheater to take a slot that otherwise would be available to a legit player.
This wouldn't necessarily be a big deal on servers with few players, but for busy servers that isn't good. Also, this would allow the cheaters to switch to griefing mode and do whatever they can to disrupt a server in other ways. While there's novelty in it, ultimately just kicking them to the curb is the better option IMO.
This wouldn't necessarily be a big deal on servers with few players, but for busy servers that isn't good. Also, this would allow the cheaters to switch to griefing mode and do whatever they can to disrupt a server in other ways. While there's novelty in it, ultimately just kicking them to the curb is the better option IMO.
#450
Posted 22 August 2013 - 04:28 PM
Txc, on 22 August 2013 - 04:18 PM, said:
So Sci-Fi time :D .
It is possible to make it in a way that anticheat does not ban cheaters & there is no banlist , BUT it does better thing it makes the playing experience really unpleasant for them . You know what '' slap '' do to players , do you not ?
Other nastier commands can be added ...
It is possible to make it in a way that anticheat does not ban cheaters & there is no banlist , BUT it does better thing it makes the playing experience really unpleasant for them . You know what '' slap '' do to players , do you not ?
Other nastier commands can be added ...
We are after the cheat and not the cheater.
doing "stuff" with dead things.
1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
Advertisement