[=KRH=RaZoR2012]

Thanks team FS for the investigation in my case

Happy to be back. I like the AC it seems to work very good

[Mod ObScUrE]

Juno, on 22 August 2013 - 11:24 AM, said:

Tungs post has disappered?

Yes, because he made an request for it.

[~SG~Juno]

I see things which dont exist!
:)

[H0i]

Can we make it to 100 pages?

[Pilou42]

It's on your hands. Release information (IP address, server, date, demos in case since you can have demo from server) and they will be commented enough to 100 pages. :-)

[/eVo/Divinity]

ROFL, this is comedy gold:

http://www.urbanterr...472#entry347472

You guys are going to need to assign someone the official "go outside and play a game of hide and go fsck yourself" duties to respond to such hilarity.

[-WAR-Runamok]

great job Frozen Sand!

I'm curious now, could you give a number (or a decent estimate) of the actual amount of accounts that logged in during the time you were collecting the data?

[[Sk&Bh]Txc]

Brainie, on 21 August 2013 - 10:23 PM, said:

Here I am with another question!



So we have this guy here who's first account was banned for cheating. He comes back with a new account, but with an obvious nickname that referees to his previous account.

What is FS going to do? You banned someone but this ass hole (sorry for the term, let's face the truth) doesn't understand the lesson and goes ahead (if at least he could be discreet, that would be great).

The system is not effective if the banned is not able to come back with discretion.

I'm just upset and pissed off despite my intervention is worth nothing.

So Sci-Fi time :D .

It is possible to make it in a way that anticheat does not ban cheaters & there is no banlist , BUT it does better thing it makes the playing experience really unpleasant for them . You know what '' slap '' do to players , do you not ?
Other nastier commands can be added ...

Not recording the player just interact with the hack . So they are welcome for more voluntary torture ;).

& it could also work as '' cheattwister '' in such a way that interacts with the hack & turns it against , so you have a cheater transformed into a absolutely helpless victim .

I do realise that especially the interact part is a little bit to hard to be executed & especially automatically .

& I suggest maybe it is not the most feasable thing to do & maybe not the best one possible either , just sounds nice .

But anyway it is good to dream :D .
And BTW my programming knowledge is very limited , so it is mostly me bullshiting around .

SilverFoxZ, on 21 August 2013 - 11:49 PM, said:

So you could be all compton and stuffs. An outlaw loose and running feeling the adrenaline every second untill you get squashed by that banhammer. Glorious.

'' It's called the panic zone
...
Some people call it torture
but its what we call home ''

:D

[/eVo/Divinity]

I seem to remember someone had made a modified server build for 4.1 that caused any hits from a "marked" person to actually damage themselves. While this is amusing, it does allow a cheater to take a slot that otherwise would be available to a legit player.

This wouldn't necessarily be a big deal on servers with few players, but for busy servers that isn't good. Also, this would allow the cheaters to switch to griefing mode and do whatever they can to disrupt a server in other ways. While there's novelty in it, ultimately just kicking them to the curb is the better option IMO.

[FS Frankie V]

Txc, on 22 August 2013 - 04:18 PM, said:

So Sci-Fi time :D .

It is possible to make it in a way that anticheat does not ban cheaters & there is no banlist , BUT it does better thing it makes the playing experience really unpleasant for them . You know what '' slap '' do to players , do you not ?
Other nastier commands can be added ...

We are after the cheat and not the cheater.