Cliclic, on 20 August 2013 - 10:24 PM, said:
I see here severals respectful clans and admins who are telling that one of theirs also fair and respectful admins or players have been put in the wrong bag ("cheaters"). I am as them certain that at least one name is miss respected and treated as "cheater" while he is NOT.
And all those players, server owners, admins who are in the fields all days and nights, and contrary to FS, they know who to trust and who to not trust. It seems that what they said was just wind, and that's sad.
A software has an integrity, truthfulness and a reliability thanks to the tests that improve its quality. I would be thanks full that you share to community the situations on which it can be trusted and those it can't be trusted and how far this software is reliable.
The community is not fool, we all are aware that a software can't be 100% reliable lol. If you would be able to develop that kind of software you should be rich by now :)
In my mind, there is two differents ways to make this program reliable.
Either, it has been made with some cheats (studied and tested with cheats) and he is maybe more reliable than i think. But it's hypocrite to ban player who installed a cheat (for test purposes) and don't use it on public servers.
Either, it has been not enough tested (in real situation) and he is not realiable at all.
It is not, ihmo, to FS to force people trusting it but it's a must for server owners (in different countries with different RULES and believes) to choose if they can trust or not this program.
I can't understand what you had in your mind when you take the responsibility to put some respectables players on the line even if they have not the same rules as you have.
It results in a split of the community and a a lot of misunderstanding of your acts.
AC is a good thing, i just think that for now, it's clearly not enough mature to be put on production and some bans in this list according to severals post (including mine) are unfair, i hope some cases will be reviewed and fairs players, admins, friends will be cleared.
Some accused admins/players are not better or worst than you, they want the same things and go on the same direction, but just on different ways, that's all and they have NEVER used cheats online. I don't talk for all the list, there are certainly some cheaters in it, but not all are, that's certain.
Don't forget, all the little admins who has spent time to prevent this game from cheaters (by studying or not cheats (not using them online) or just demo and ban cheaters). What they did, do and will do matters.
Clic
PS : I never used cheats (look into your program if you trust it that well ;) )
I don't like cheaters and have some good catches in my pockets without any cheat inside my computer (that's my convictions)
However, i am thank full to all admins who take their free time to study cheats and be able to learn others how to detect them and on which circumstance, we can say that this player is cheating or prove the contrary.
- AC reaction to all kinds of cheats was tested. When using cheats, the cheats were detected, when not using them, no cheats were detected.
- People who used the cheat only locally, so that means while watching a demo or while playing on a local server, were not banned.
- People who were playing with a cheat client, but who had all cheats disabled all the time, were not banned either.
- Some people have appealed to the ban and we are not ignoring them. I have heard interesting excuses such as "I uploaded my urt folder including my auth as a torrent and someone cheated with my auth" - even if this is true, which I very much doubt, it is your own fault. If you allowed your data to get comprimised, we still ban the account using cheats, simply because that account was detected using cheats.
I think people who have nearly no knowledge of how the AC works, and what we did, should not pretend that they know what they're talking about. Because they really have no clue.
This topic is locked
MultiQuote
community admin
